Understanding Multiple Sending Accounts in lemlist: Adding Senders to Your Team

Email marketing with Lemlist promises efficiency and utmost results, but their pricing plan can be frustrating somehow.

Adding multiple sending accounts to your team comes with a range of complexities and costs that may leave you scratching your head. However, in this article, we take a closer look at the negatives impacts of Lemlist’s pricing model.

Adding Team Members: A Costly Process

Adding team members in Lemlist is not as straightforward as it may seem:

1. Upgrading Your Plan: You’d think that increasing the number of sending accounts in your Lemlist account would be simple. However, the process starts by upgrading your plan under “Plans & Billing.” You’ll quickly notice that this upgrade will incur additional costs.
2. Invitations and Per-User Charges: Once you’ve upgraded, you must send invitations to your team members. Each invitee must have a seat on the same plan as you, and here’s where the real pain starts. Lemlist charges you per user, which means every team member you add costs you more.

Pricing Structure: A Wallet-Draining Mystery

The current pricing model in Lemlist is nothing short of bewildering:

• You pay a substantial amount for each seat, and this will remain the case until unspecified changes are rolled out sometime in Q1 2024.
• What these changes will entail remains a mystery, leaving users in a state of uncertainty.

Sender-to-Seat Relationship: A Costly Tangle

If you’re looking to diversify your sender profiles, you’ll quickly realize it’s an expensive endeavor:

• Each sender you want to add necessitates a seat on your team, each of which costs a staggering $99 per month.
• In simple terms, it’s a bewildering $99 per sender email address.
• Your senders can’t participate in campaigns without a subscription, adding to the financial burden.

Future Changes: A Distant Promise

lemlist acknowledges that their pricing model is a source of frustration. They’ve promised changes in Q1 2024, but the specifics remain in the shadows, leaving users in a state of doubt and annoyance.